Power value-added service model of power selling c

Analysis of the power value-added service mode of power selling companies under the background of power selling side reform

the fact that power selling companies can freely choose power selling companies is an important manifestation of the effectiveness of power selling side reform. From the unified purchase and sale of electricity to the marketization of power trading, the emergence of power selling companies as the main body of the power market has separated the power selling business from the traditional power system, thus forming a game between power selling companies and power users, Specifically, in order to obtain high profits, power selling companies need to buy low-cost electricity from power enterprises or power generation enterprises, and then sell it to power users at high prices. The process of trading between power selling companies and power users is actually a process of mutual game between their interests

electricity sales side reform

in the process of electricity sales side reform, in order to complete the marketization of electricity sales, electricity trading centers, electricity sales companies and other entities have been actually added. From the production to consumption of electricity, the increase of intermediary media will inevitably affect the marginal cost accounting of electricity transmission when it is possible for electricity marketization transactions. At present, as a supervisory organization and trading platform, the power trading center reflects the interests of power enterprises, and also undertakes the task of ensuring the implementation of guaranteed power supply services and the smooth operation of the power trading market. With the marketization of power trading, the power trading center, as a platform for service-oriented cables, should have the characteristics of relative independence, standardization and fairness. However, at present, the establishment of power trading structure is too redundant, which restricts the further deepening of power system reform

energy supply side reform

the power selling side reform is mainly divided into three categories according to whether the power selling companies have distribution and operation rights or power generation capacity. Among them, the power selling companies without distribution and operation rights and power generation capacity do not need to undertake guaranteed power supply services. The game between these power selling companies and power users is relatively clear, and the competition between these power selling companies is more intense, but they can also show their flexibility in the power trading market if they are loose, The game with power users is more important in the choice of price negotiation. Because there is no burden advantage of guaranteed power supply services, the main power users of this kind of power selling companies are concentrated in the types of industrial and commercial power users. The relative price of electricity is high, and the power selling companies have room for negotiation, while industrial and commercial power users also have power market transactions to obtain power with high cost performance

resources determine the game chips

and the game between power selling companies with distribution rights or power generation capacity and power users may be more complex. According to the idea of deepening the reform of the power system, the accounting of power transmission and distribution should be supervised by the third-party structure, while the problem of who can supervise the regulator objectively and fairly lacks scientific basis. Such power selling companies have greater chips in the game with power users to balance the relationship between profits and market share

energy classroom

the direction of the current power system reform policy is relatively clear, but in the process of specific implementation, such as the emergence of power selling companies in the reform of the power selling side, it shows a mixed situation to a certain extent. First, the power trading centers representing different regional stakeholders lack unified standards in the registration, publicity, cross regional transactions and other aspects of power selling companies, At present, it is preliminarily estimated that there are more than 10000 enterprises involved in the power sales business in China, and more than 3000 enterprises have been publicized by local power trading centers to participate in the trading business of Brazil China Sea freight of $9.073/ton power. However, due to different regulations, grades and authorities of local power trading centers, it is difficult to flatten the competitive relationship between power sales companies and power sales companies, However, the game between power selling companies and power users continues the power transmission relationship between power enterprises and power users in the past due to the lack of free choice of power users

10 minute reading and thinking in the energy class

in terms of the reform of the power sales side, in order to truly realize the marketization of the power sales business, we must first standardize the rules and constraints of the power trading center and the improvement of the system after the threshold access project is completed, coordinate the interest demands of the Beijing power trading center and the South power trading center with the attitude of top-level design, and plan the establishment of the secondary power trading center with the power transmission pattern, Instead of setting up administrative regional power trading centers based on regional interests. The unification and standardization of power trading platform and regulatory process is more conducive to promoting the competition between power selling companies. Only by stimulating the participation enthusiasm of power selling companies and increasing the competition heat among power selling companies, can we give full play to the power users' choice in the process of power market transactions. Otherwise, it is difficult for power users who lack the right of free choice to form a game relationship with power selling companies, and the power selling side reform that cannot give full play to the enthusiasm of power users must not be the real power market reform